No Cap -- No More

A judge in Fulton County, Georgia, has struck down the cap on monetary awards in a medical malpractice case.

Superior Court Judge Marvin Arrington wrote that the cap was unconstitutional because it allowed protection to the medical profession that was not allowed to other defendants such as manufacturers of defective products.

"It is absurd to say that if you get injured by a product that the jury can decide your noneconomic damages, but if you get injured by medical malpractice, it can't," said Trent Speckhals, one of the lawyers for Cheon Park, the plaintiff in the case.

Judge Arrington's decision only affects this case but, if appealed, will open the door for the Georgia Supreme Court to overturn the caps for malpractice cases.  If not overturned it would effectively mean that only the wealthy could get large settlements because they have large incomes that could be lost because of malpractice.

"The statute effectively puts substantial limitations on the rights of the poor and middle class to recovery while leaving the right to virtually unlimited recoveries unimpeded for the wealthy," Arrington said. "The disabled manager of a hedge fund, a corporate CEO, an entertainer or such other person whose income is in the tens of millions of dollars has a claim under Georgia law that would dwarf the amount awarded in any case for pain and suffering."

 

Medical Injuries are worldwide

This from an article in Ireland.  A settlement in a birth injury case involving a failure to properly electronically monitor the labor as is progressed.  The result was severe cerebral palsy.

Details were not disclosed except that it was substantial and the full amount claimed.

In a statement read out in court by Mrs Swaine on the couple's behalf, she criticised the hospital for the way they were treated both during and after the birth.

She said during her labour, which was induced, she and her husband had waited so long for the arrival of their first child and what should have been a joyous occasion "soon turned into the most tragic of our lives."

She said that during her labour, she and her husband told a nurse they felt something was wrong and they were "basically ignored".

Christopher, who was born on July 21, 2002, with severe cerebral palsy, had to be resuscitated after birth and spent a month in intensive care where the parents had to learn to feed him through a tube.

In the claim for damages, it was stated Mrs Swaine was admitted to the NMH, following previous admissions for monitoring during her pregnancy for hypertension.

She was overdue and was left on the ante-natal ward for 24 hours before she was given drugs to induce labour. The hospital administered doses of one drug in excess of appropriate guidelines while there was also a failure to establish the well-being of the baby before administering another drug, it was claimed.

There was also a failure to carry out proper electronic monitoring of the baby and there was no appropriate investigation of Mrs Swaine's complaints, it was claimed.

The child was born with severe physical and intellectual disabilities, including recurring respiratory problems and would have been, had he survived, unable to sit or walk independently.

On November 23, 2002, he died from breathing complications as a result of the injuries sustained by him during the course of his birth, it was claimed.

Source: Independent.ie

Cerebral Palsy Settlements

Occasionally I will post about a cerebral palsy settlement.  I don't do it all that often, but two articles today. One from Australia  and one from the UK that I also wanted to post.  Why?  Well, I merely wanted to raise awareness that cerebral palsy lawsuits or settlements or whatever are not just an American creation.  They happen all over the world.  The legal systems just deal with them differently.

This settlement from the UK. 

Court awards £5m to brain-damaged boy


This one from Australia

Hospital Admits to Drug Folly